| Server IP : 54.36.91.62 / Your IP : 216.73.217.112 Web Server : Apache System : Linux webm013.cluster127.gra.hosting.ovh.net 5.15.206-ovh-vps-grsec-zfs-classid #1 SMP Fri May 15 02:41:25 UTC 2026 x86_64 User : coopiak ( 151928) PHP Version : 8.3.23 Disable Function : _dyuweyrj4,_dyuweyrj4r,dl MySQL : OFF | cURL : ON | WGET : ON | Perl : ON | Python : ON | Sudo : OFF | Pkexec : OFF Directory : /home/coopiak/amisdesseniors-fr/libraries/src/Service/Provider/ |
Upload File : |
<?php
/**
* Joomla! Content Management System
*
* @copyright (C) 2023 Open Source Matters, Inc. <https://www.joomla.org>
* @license GNU General Public License version 2 or later; see LICENSE.txt
*/
namespace Joomla\CMS\Service\Provider;
use Joomla\CMS\Input\Input as CMSInput;
use Joomla\DI\Container;
use Joomla\DI\ServiceProviderInterface;
/**
* Service provider for the the Joomla Input object.
*
* Whilst generally speaking it's an anti-pattern for the request object to be in a DIC, in the case of Joomla whilst
* there, both the web application class and session class have a hard dependency on the input object, as a result it's
* required that this exists in the DIC for now. Strategically there should be a long term plan to remove this from the
* DIC.
*
* @note It is strongly recommended that extensions get the input object from the application and DO NOT use this
* service container.
*
* @since 5.0.0
*/
class Input implements ServiceProviderInterface
{
/**
* Registers the service provider with a DI container.
*
* @param Container $container The DI container.
*
* @return void
*
* @since 5.0.0
*/
public function register(Container $container)
{
$container->share(
CMSInput::class,
function () {
return new CMSInput();
},
true
);
}
}